[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
<meta name="enamad" content="330666"/>
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 57 (HISTORICAL STUDIES OF ISLAM , 2023) ::
مطالعات تاریخ اسلام 2023, 15(57): 91-111 Back to browse issues page
A Comparative Analysis of Two Text-oriented and Context-oriented Approaches in the Evolution of Imamiyyah Theology and Jurisprudence in 4th and 5th Centuries AH
Mohammad Basedaghat , Ali Bayat * , Ahmad Badkoobeh
Associate Professor, Department of History and Civilization of Islamic Nations, Faculty of Theology, University of Tehran, Iran , abayat@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (656 Views)
A clear transformation has emerged in the thought of Imami jurisprudence and theology during the 4th and 5th centuries AH, and researchers have often investigated this issue and its factors using two different approaches. Some with a context-oriented approach have highlighted historical contexts and considered the evolution of Imamiyyah theology and jurisprudence in this period to be affected by the context and historical conditions, especially the rise of the Buyid dynasty. Some others, using an invariant approach, have emphasized on the stability of Imami thought from emergence to the period in question, and considered the Imami thought of that period to be merely an expansion of the previous texts of the Imamiyyah. In this paper, the first two approaches mentioned in the researches are introduced, then the third approach called “principle-reality” approach which is based on the tradition of Imamiyyah scholars has been concluded that in the analysis of the evolution of Imami theology and jurisprudence in the discussed period, neither contextualism nor pure invariantism was a comprehensive approach. Meanwhile, the "principle-reality" approach that takes contexts, requirements, historical variables of that era as well as preserving the principles and theological-jurisprudential principles of the Imams (AS) is more credible in explaining the issue.
Keywords: : Evolution of Imamiyyah theology, evolution of Imamiyyah jurisprudence, fourth and fifth centuries AH, contextualism, invariantism, principle-reality approach.
Full-Text [PDF 997 kb]   (379 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Islamic History/ Interdisciplinary History
Received: 2023/03/5 | Revised: 2023/10/17 | Accepted: 2023/06/19 | Published: 2023/07/1 | ePublished: 2023/07/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Basedaghat M, Bayat A, Badkoobeh A. A Comparative Analysis of Two Text-oriented and Context-oriented Approaches in the Evolution of Imamiyyah Theology and Jurisprudence in 4th and 5th Centuries AH. مطالعات تاریخ اسلام 2023; 15 (57) :91-111
URL: http://journal.pte.ac.ir/article-1-992-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 57 (HISTORICAL STUDIES OF ISLAM , 2023) Back to browse issues page
پژوهشكده تاريخ اسلام، فصلنامه مطالعات تاریخ اسلام A Quarterly Journal of Historical Studies of Islam
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645